The book Flowers for Algernon, by Daniel Keyes, tells the fictional story of a mentally disabled man named Charlie, who goes through a surgery that has been tested on a mouse named Algernon to raise his IQ. In it, a large social issue is the way that Charlie is treated when he is mentally disabled. Of course, Charlie doesn't understand what's going on and doesn't know he's being made fun of, and he only realizes that people have been laughing at him, and using him, through flashbacks after the surgery. What's horrible about the situation is that the ones making fun of him and using him the most were the people he thought were his friends at the bakery where he worked.
In the days where Charlie was mentally disabled, he thought that those that he worked with at Donner's Bakery were his friends (his only friends). Little did he know, they were making fun of him all along, and he had been the source of mockery since he had first started his job there. During a flashback, he shows us just how much they mocked him, and how innocent he was. "He's a scream", one of the girls said. Everybody was laughing. 'Oh you were right, Frank,' choked Ellen. 'He's a one man side show.' Then she said, 'Here, Charlie, have a fruit.' She gave me an apple, but when I bit into it, it was fake." One of the bakers also used Charlie to make a profit for himself, making him deliver cakes and pastries to customers who he gave discounts to in exchange of a side payment for himself. Of course, Charlie was clueless and simply did what he was told. The bakers weren't the only ones making fun of him, as boys on the street laughed at him and threw garbage at him, when all he wanted to do was play with them.
I think that the bakers' perspectives are left out because it leaves the reader thinking about why they treated Charlie this way. It first seems like Charlie couldn't have possibly done anything wrong to them, but he could have possibly threatened their job security. We are given insight into why they treated him this way though once he returns to the bakery after the surgery. Since he's now smarter than them, they despise him. They made fun of him to feel superior, and since they weren't the most intelligent people, he was the only one they could use to make fun of, the only person below them. I think not giving this perspective actually shows us more of what these people are like than if their perspective was shown: if their perspective was shown the reader might feel sympathy for them if they had a tough life and Charlie was the only person they could mock, when actually that would be no excuse for them to laugh at a disabled and innocent man.
The situations in this book show the social issues of how disabled people may be treated, and how hard it is for someone who is mentally disabled to live a normal life. Charlie thinks he has friend, but they are his enemies, and once he starts living his dream and becoming more intelligent, they reject him because he makes them feel less superior. Charlie's situation shows that people are sometimes not what they seem like, and can hide a dark side when you think they are your friends, not your foes. This book shows how horrible society can be, and how innocent people like Charlie can wind up facing it alone.
I like how you included the perspective of the antagonists who might've had a different motivation than what the author chose to show us.
ReplyDelete